Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!dali.cs.montana.edu!caen!uwm.edu!psuvax1!news
From: melling@cs.psu.edu (Michael D Mellinger)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
Subject: Re: NeXT software size
Message-ID: <!+5Gs#w$1@cs.psu.edu>
Date: 8 May 91 03:05:36 GMT
References: <1991May5.124008.24559@sugar.hackercorp.com> <oo5G$dx*1@cs.psu.edu>
	<1991May6.113553.8351@sugar.hackercorp.com>
	<1991May7.055159.1474@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu>
Sender: news@cs.psu.edu (Usenet)
Organization: Penn State Computer Science
Lines: 14
In-Reply-To: sss10@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu's message of Tue, 7 May 1991 05:51:59 GMT
Nntp-Posting-Host: sunws5.sys.cs.psu.edu


In article <1991May7.055159.1474@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> sss10@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Homicidal Lunatic) writes:

   >
   >Ah! The old "RAM is cheap" argument. I've been hearing it for 10 years, and
   >it's been "oh, we had to worry about that a few years ago but now RAM is
   >finally too cheap to meter!" Never happen.

   yeah, i mean ram is just so cheap I can plunk down a few dollars and add the 2
   megs of ram I really want/need on my 500.

Four megs of RAM costs less than $200.  You should try shopping around.

-Mike