Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!wuarchive!cec2!news
From: amc4919@cec2.wustl.edu (Adam M. Costello)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.datacomm
Subject: Re: 19200bps
Keywords: 19200 bps
Message-ID: <1991May7.125031.2331@cec1.wustl.edu>
Date: 7 May 91 12:50:31 GMT
References: <1991May5.185645.12902@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> <1991May5.201708.452@cec1.wustl.edu> <dillon.7375@overload.Berkeley.CA.US>
Sender: news@cec1.wustl.edu (USENET News System)
Organization: Washington University, St. Louis MO
Lines: 9

In article <dillon.7375@overload.Berkeley.CA.US> dillon@overload.Berkeley.CA.US (Matthew Dillon) writes:
>    half of it, which is what 9600bps (V.32) modems do now (9600bps full
>    duplex = 19.2KB bandwidth).  The best you will ever see on a phone line

You say that current 9600bps modems can sustain that rate in both directions?
Then it should be no problem to have 19200bps one direction (and, say, 1200bps
the other).  I think this would be far more useful anyway.  In my experience,
the traffic is always much greater in one direction.
AMC