Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!sdd.hp.com!think.com!mintaka!mole.gnu.ai.mit.edu!gfm
From: gfm@mole.gnu.ai.mit.edu (George)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.games
Subject: Re: Chessamster 2100 patch
Message-ID: <1991May7.184312.29179@mintaka.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: 7 May 91 18:43:12 GMT
References: <1991May06.155345.17107@cs.ruu.nl> <1991May7.002909.17186@mintaka.lcs.mit.edu> <1991May7.032824.12059@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>
Sender: news@mintaka.lcs.mit.edu
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 19

In article <1991May7.032824.12059@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> l-rittle@uiuc.edu (Loren J. Rittle) writes:
>
>Sorry George,
>  Utter bullshit!  If you had bothered to download the `patch' in
>question, you would know that this `patch' was indeed the main executable 
>of the game!  It is not a patch to the 2100 game, but rather the patched
>game.  I sent Tad some mail that it should be removed and it was.
>
>Loren J. Rittle
>--
>``NewTek stated that the Toaster  *would*  *not*  be made to directly support
>  the Mac, at this point Sculley stormed out of the booth...'' --- A scene at
>  the recent MacExpo.  Gee, you wouldn't think that an Apple Exec would be so
>  worried about one little Amiga device... Loren J. Rittle  l-rittle@uiuc.edu

	1) We were talking about the 'patch' not the patched game...No I didnt 'bother' to download it, I have no use for it at all....and if an exe exsisted that actually just PATCHED the game it would not be illegal...

	2) If the patched main executable is what is up on ab20, then its not a patch, just a modified binary, and thus the original poster should not
have said this 'patch' was illegal (wrong use of a term)...