Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!apple!portal!cup.portal.com!Fletcher From: Fletcher@cup.portal.com (fletcher sullivan segall) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware Subject: Re: 68030+68040 on A3000: is it possible? Message-ID: <41966@cup.portal.com> Date: 3 May 91 17:08:00 GMT References: <24561@well.sf.ca.us> Distribution: na Organization: The Portal System (TM) Lines: 39 > > At the back of AmigaWorld's April '91 issue, in the section devoted >to rumors, speculation, etc., there was an intrigueing idea proposed: >Designing an 040 board that would allow the 030/882 to continue functioning, >essentially as coprocessors to the 040. They stated that all that would be >needed to implement this would be to "tweak" the system software so that >it would recognize both chips were aboard. Sounds like an interesting idea. Unfortunately most structure locking is done with Disable/Enable, or Forbid/Permit rather than with system semaphores, so the whole system would frequently revert to mono-processing. But I doubt that the Rom/Kernel will be modified to run multi-processing. No doubt OS/9 will step forward quickly to fill the gap to some degree, and I imagine a variety of hacks will come out to allow certain system functions to run on the '030 as a coprocessor. This might include blitter emulation, or various device support routines. > >A wonderful idea! though the 030/882 combination would be grossly slower >than the 040, it seems to me that on our multitasking system, they could be >used to manage the more mundane system tasks, while the real "gut-busters" >would simply be sliced to the 040 exclusively. > >Unfortunately, as i understand it the Fast Slot on the A3000 motherboard >is a bus master slot - it disables the 030. Your information is incorrect. The coprocessor slot on the A3000 fully supports using both processors simultaneously (this is one of the changes from the A2000). > >Would a crafty hardware firm be able to create a workaround? is it feasible? >is it worth the trouble? - it seems a waste to throw out the 7.5 mips the >A3000 pumps out...27+ Mips would be screaming.... > I think the 68030 at 25MHz is only about 4.25 (V2,1) MIPS. -ss Fletcher@cup.portal.com