Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!uunet!mnemosyne.cs.du.edu!isis.cs.du.edu!bscott From: bscott@isis.cs.du.edu (Ben Scott) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.marketplace Subject: Re: Educational Prices Summary: Why the 3000 is cheaper Message-ID: <1991May6.212610.8838@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> Date: 6 May 91 21:26:10 GMT Article-I.D.: mnemosyn.1991May6.212610.8838 References: <285@nos850.UUCP> <1991May4.195627.4389@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> <91124.202253DXB132@psuvm.psu.edu> <1991May5.014745.5260@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> Sender: usenet@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu (netnews admin account) Reply-To: bscott@isis.UUCP (Ben Scott) Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix (sponsored by U. of Denver Math/CS dept.) Lines: 25 In article <1991May5.014745.5260@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> es1@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Ethan Solomita) writes: >>There you go again with your unfounded "expansion slots are expensive" > > Ok! Then you explain it! 8-) Everything else about the The 3000 is much cheaper to build, since it is smaller (which also makes it cheaper to package and ship) and was designed more recently so the experience gained over the years comes into play. For example, they don't socket the '030 and '882 (which costs more than most think). Also, Commodore has a much greater incentive to sell 3000s than 2500s, so they aren't working as hard to keep the price low on 2500s. At least, this is my theory. On the other hand, it is common that once the development costs are covered by sales, prices drop radically (witness the recent near-50% cut in price of the 2091, for example). One would think that the 2500 has long passed this point, and the 3000 is not even close yet. ?? . <<<>>> -- |Ben Scott, professional goof-off and consultant at The Raster Image, Denver| |Internet bscott@isis.cs.du.edu, or call the Arvada 68K BBS at (303)424-6208| | "All syllogisms have three parts... || The Raster Image IS responsible | | Therefore this is not a syllogism." || for everything I say! | *Amiga* |