Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!wuarchive!udel!rochester!rutgers!cbmvax!peter From: peter@cbmvax.commodore.com (Peter Cherna) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer Subject: Re: Message-ID: <21343@cbmvax.commodore.com> Date: 7 May 91 15:47:55 GMT References: <1991May7.035139.21051@ccu.umanitoba.ca> Reply-To: peter@cbmvax.commodore.com (Peter Cherna) Distribution: na Organization: Commodore-Amiga, Inc. West Chester, PA. Lines: 19 In article <1991May7.035139.21051@ccu.umanitoba.ca> kaarts@ccu.umanitoba.ca (Kenneth John Aarts) writes: >P.S. The whole point of this excersize is to write a new ed (starter for >CygnusEd) that will when called with an arguement (while ced is already loaded) >will just open a ced view for that file, instead of asking to start a new ced >process. If this improvement has been made my anybody, let me know and save me >this hassle! Also let me know if I am doing something stupid with Ced that >this is not the automatic responce. Um, I just tried that, and that's exactly what "ed" does. If you have Ced already running, then "ed" opens a new view in the existing Ced screen or window. Running "ced" a second time gives you a second Ced process. Are you sure you don't have "ed" aliased to "ced" or something? Peter -- Peter Cherna, Operating Systems Development Group, Commodore-Amiga, Inc. {uunet|rutgers}!cbmvax!peter peter@cbmvax.commodore.com My opinions do not necessarily represent the opinions of my employer. "If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail."