Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!mips!apple!dlyons From: dlyons@Apple.COM (David A. Lyons) Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2 Subject: Re: DTS Message-ID: <52446@apple.Apple.COM> Date: 4 May 91 05:24:05 GMT References: <9JXc23w164w@xcluud.sccsi.com> Organization: Apple Computer Inc., Cupertino, CA Lines: 65 In article <9JXc23w164w@xcluud.sccsi.com> gtolar@xcluud.sccsi.com (Glynne Tolar) writes: >[...] >I talked to Andrew at CV Technoligies eariler today. He explained to me in >what I caused to be a lengthy conversation that he was a developer that >paied the $600 a year (yes, I know it is now $300 and I did correct him) and >he said "And you know what I get for the $600? A bunch of Mac crap." Now >no flame here Matt but what is the deal? That picture of the Apple Partners program is incomplete. For $300 you get a monthly mailing, including Apple II Technical Notes every other month (for $600 you get Macintosh Technical Notes in the other other months). You get significant discounts on a limited (not tiny) amount of equipment per year. You get official access to Developer Technical Support. >My personal observation...That is Apple's idea of Apple II developer >support. Send Mac developement materals, develope on the Mac (for II >software, how strange). Explains the 2 Macs in Andy's cube. If you want to see things that way, I can't convince you not to. Here's how I see it: (1) Sounds like CV Technologies paid their $600 and is receiving information on both the Macintosh and Apple II lines. And they're probably getting LOTS of Macintosh stuff--not surprising considering the impending release of System 7.0, etc. (2) Developing Apple II software on a Macintosh is not at all strange. It's not the solution for everybody. For me and my coworkers it's the obvious choice because of the following things I can do on a Mac running MPW that I can't do on a GS, at least not with today's hardware and software: (a) Use a 20-inch screen with many windows open. (b) Use the Projector project-management system to make sure only one person is using a given source file at one time, and to provide access to the "history" of our source code ("Not all changes are improvements"). (c) Rebuild large software modules quickly. (d) Keep the GS systems free to test out the latest-and-greatest version every time I make some changes. I use an 8 Meg Macintosh IIci at work. So what? >[...] if Apple II software engineers are just trainees for future jobs in Mac >developement. Not me. >[...] Problem is, should be settle for just >the bones Apple throws our way or is their going to be any meet anytime. (Loaded question? Nah....) My opinion: You should continually be as productive as possible with whatever is available, paying little attention to gloom-and-doom rumors *or* "System 12.0 / ROM 42" rumors. -- David A. Lyons, Apple Computer, Inc. | DAL Systems Apple II System Software Engineer | P.O. Box 875 America Online: Dave Lyons | Cupertino, CA 95015-0875 GEnie:DAVE.LYONS CompuServe:72177,3233 Internet:dlyons@apple.com My opinions are my own, not Apple's.