Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!wuarchive!uunet!ogicse!cs.uoregon.edu!ns.uoregon.edu!milton!alexd
From: alexd@milton.u.washington.edu (Alex Danilchik)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: CodeHead Software Util.s
Message-ID: <1991May7.061918.11199@milton.u.washington.edu>
Date: 7 May 91 06:19:18 GMT
References: <41916@cup.portal.com> <59794@aurs01.UUCP> <42052@cup.portal.com>
Distribution: usa
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Lines: 27

In article <42052@cup.portal.com> Dave_Ninjajr_Flory@cup.portal.com writes:
> 
>re. CodeKeys, if I had to give up all but one, I think I'd keep 
>CodeKeys as it lets you automate any operation to a key stroke. Link 
>files let you have a different set of macros for each program, and 
>one macro can load another set so the number is not limited to 32. 
>It's equivalent, in my opinion to Quickeys, which I just got for the 
>Mac II I use at work. I paid $98 for Quickey, because I have learned 
>how valuable macro keys can be by using CodeKeys, @$40. It's a 
>bargain.
>
>Dave_Ninjajr_Flory@cup.portal.com

Correct me  if i am wrong.. and i don't have quickeys.. but
i read that quickeys or Tempo II for the mac .. one of them
at least.. allows you to record a mouse click on a file by 
scanning for the filename or something.. this you CAN"T do
with codekeys.. if your file structure changes.. since 
codekeys only remembers coordinates..

someone please correctme on this...

thanks...

cheers!
gunnar
alexd@milton.u.washington.edu