Xref: utzoo news.groups:31754 comp.sys.handhelds:7606
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!turing.toronto.edu!ruhtra
Newsgroups: news.groups,comp.sys.handhelds
From: ruhtra@turing.toronto.edu (Arthur Tateishi)
Subject: Re: RFD:  comp.sys.handhelds.hp48 and comp.sources.hp48 moderated
Message-ID: <1991May8.104041.17401@jarvis.csri.toronto.edu>
Organization: CSRI, University of Toronto
References: <4723@ryn.mro4.dec.com> <1991May7.223538.10367@jarvis.csri.toronto.edu> <15674@life.ai.mit.edu>
Date: 8 May 91 14:40:41 GMT
Lines: 11

In article <15674@life.ai.mit.edu> bson@rice-chex.ai.mit.edu (Jan Brittenson) writes:
>. Let it prove itself over a period of about a year,
>like the HP-48 has.

I think you misinterpreted me. I was opposing a split-by-manufacturer.
As you said, and I agree, there is no basis for grouping the hp48 and
machines like the hp95.
-- 
Red Alert.
    -- Q, "Deja Q", stardate 43539.1
Arthur Tateishi                 g9ruhtra@zero.cdf.utoronto.edu