Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!uunet!jwt!john
From: john@jwt.UUCP (John Temples)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Re: IRQ 2 on AT-class machines
Message-ID: <5!G+!RL@jwt.UUCP>
Date: 6 May 91 17:21:52 GMT
References: <li.673350356@mrcnext.cso.uiuc.edu> <H=D++AH@jwt.UUCP> <li.673438213@mrcnext.cso.uiuc.edu>
Organization: Private System -- Orlando, FL
Lines: 9

In article <li.673438213@mrcnext.cso.uiuc.edu> li@mrcnext.cso.uiuc.edu (hans li) writes:
>nope, irq 2 is used for the cascade interrupt, usually if you're running
>MULTIPLE controllers.

Your original posting said multiple drives, not multiple controllers.
But I've still never heard of such a thing.  Cascading interrupt
controllers, yes, but cascading hard disk controllers?
-- 
John W. Temples -- john@jwt.UUCP (uunet!jwt!john)