Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!usc!orion.oac.uci.edu!ucivax!jarthur!euler.claremont.edu!dhosek From: dhosek@euler.claremont.edu (Don Hosek) Newsgroups: comp.text.tex Subject: Benchmark comparison of two big TeXs for the PC Message-ID: <1991May6.175345.1@euler.claremont.edu> Date: 7 May 91 00:53:45 GMT Sender: news@jarthur.Claremont.EDU Organization: Harvey Mudd College Lines: 33 Well, I've finally gotten round to doing a benchmark to see how much faster PCTeX is than emTeX. The file I tested is the current revision of my LaTeX book (currently 128 pages). It's a nice test in that it contains a little of just about everything. I compared tex386b (PCTeX) to btex286 (emTeX) since the file is too demanding to run in an ordinary TeX (or even the 128K TeX which is the current PCTeX standard). The benchmarks were run in a DESQview BigDOS window (modified to use 4DOS as the shell) which was the only window open on my 25mHz 386 PC. I was running the Hyperdisk DiskCache program with staged writes on. Care was taken that both programs were tested under identical operating conditions. The results: tex386b: 4:13.21 btex286: 14:46.39 A few notes. PCTeX still hasn't fixed the bug with 8-bit input handling. It also is less forgiving of low memory conditions than emTeX is (the benchmarks were run with 3500K of EMS available to each program). Those of you needing a big TeX who have a large-memory 386 (I'd say at least 4M for reasonable performance) would do well to get the PCTeX version if you can live without the eight-bit handling. -dh -- Don Hosek | To retrieve files from ymir via the mailserver, dhosek@ymir.claremont.edu | send a message to mailserv@ymir.claremont.edu Quixote Digital Typography | with a line saying send [DIRECTORY]FILENAME 714-625-0147 | where DIRECTORY is the FTP directory (sans ---------------------------+ "anonymous") and FILENAME is the filename, e.g. "send [tex]00readme.txt". There is a list of files in each directory under the name 00files.txt. Binary files are not available by this technique.