Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!crdgw1!uunet!kithrup!sef From: sef@kithrup.COM (Sean Eric Fagan) Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386 Subject: Re: SCO License security - another flame Message-ID: <1991May04.194857.12216@kithrup.COM> Date: 4 May 91 19:48:57 GMT References: <1165@pemcom.pem-stuttgart.de> <91V712w164w@mudos.ann-arbor.mi.us> Organization: Kithrup Enterprises, Ltd. Lines: 47 In article <91V712w164w@mudos.ann-arbor.mi.us> mju@mudos.ann-arbor.mi.us (Marc Unangst) writes: >X11R4, Mayhap. But SCO didn't do the port of X, Locus did, and people at sco were very unhappy with them. (At least some of the engineers were.) >Motif 1.1, As far as I know, it wasn't out at the time. Or don't you realize that it's somewhat difficult to release something that doesn't exist? >the BSD FFS, Why? The BSD FFS would have been a terrible bitch to port. It was easier to make their own FFS, and later add in long filenames. (When they release 3.2v3, I think I shall post a patch showing how to make the filename limit go from 255 to 266 8-).) >symbolic links, What makes you think they *didn't*? >System Vr4.0, A piece of crap. Buggy as hell, larger than 3.2, slow, ugly. >real HDB UUCP, Gee. I've never had any problems with their uucp, and I used it quite extensively for over two years. >and commands like su(1) and cron(1) that work the way I expect them to. Yeah. You're right. They never did anything about this. And that SLS (available from sco [maybe uunet, too, I don't know]) which is corrects the C2 problems (they only way I notice the c2 stuff anymore is because passwords aren't in /etc/passwd; however, this can be a good thing) therefore doesn't exist. Why don't you try actually seeing what is released instead of being an asshole and complaining? -- Sean Eric Fagan | "I made the universe, but please don't blame me for it; sef@kithrup.COM | I had a bellyache at the time." -----------------+ -- The Turtle (Stephen King, _It_) Any opinions expressed are my own, and generally unpopular with others.