Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!samsung!nstar!larry
From: larry@nstar.rn.com (Larry Snyder)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Re: SCO License security - another flame
Message-ID: <1991May08.123132.19051@nstar.rn.com>
Date: 8 May 91 12:31:32 GMT
References: <1165@pemcom.pem-stuttgart.de> <91V712w164w@mudos.ann-arbor.mi.us> 	<1991May04.194857.12216@kithrup.COM> <GAR.91May6105839@spiff.UUCP>
Distribution: comp
Organization: NSTAR, Indiana's LARGEST BBS 219-289-0287/317-251-7391
Lines: 18

gar@spiff.UUCP (Gordon Runkle) writes:

>As far as the 'buggy as hell' assertion, this seems to echo SCO's
>official position, and is not consistent with reality.  I've not
>encountered any showstoppers in SVR4.  (SCO didn't complain when SCO
>UNIX 3.2v0 was 'buggy as hell'.)  The next version of SVR4 (version 3)
>should fix the few remaining annoyances.

Just about everyone with SCO refers to SVR4 as "buggy as hell" - 
like I said earlier - I remember my first release of Xenix several
years ago (re: "buggy as hell")


-- 
      Larry Snyder, NSTAR Public Access Unix 219-289-0287/317-251-7391
                         HST/PEP/V.32/v.32bis/v.42bis 
                        regional UUCP mapping coordinator 
               {larry@nstar.rn.com, ..!uunet!nstar.rn.com!larry}