Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!news.cs.indiana.edu!widener!netnews.upenn.edu!vax1.cc.lehigh.edu!cert.sei.cmu.edu!krvw From: umbc3!umbc3.umbc.edu!cs106132@uunet.UU.NET (cs106132) Newsgroups: comp.virus Subject: F-PROT and FluShot problems Message-ID: <0007.9105061316.AA01852@ubu.cert.sei.cmu.edu> Date: 3 May 91 17:10:20 GMT Sender: Virus Discussion List Lines: 17 Approved: krvw@sei.cmu.edu Hello, I was testing the new release of F-PROT 1.15a the other day, and came across an interesting problem. It happened when a variant of 4096 was active. Since F-PROT did not know this strain, it could not detect it. This is expected as the documentation hints. However, when I ran F-OSCHK, the virus infected the system files (IBMBIO....), the result was a non-bootable hard disk. This indicates that F-PROT can actually contribute to the spread of this kind of viruses. This is not a bug type of thing, it is a design flaw! I repeated the same test using FluShot+ (1.81), the same thing happened in a slightly different manner. But the system again became impossible to boot from the hard disk. I had to run SYS C: to restore the sanity of the system. Any comments? Regards, Tarkan