Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!ox.com!math.fu-berlin.de!fauern!unido!rwthinf!slcdec!hippo!f1.n6000.z2.fidonet.org!p111.f11.n310.z2.fidonet.org!Johannes_Blach
From: Johannes_Blach@p111.f11.n310.z2.fidonet.org (Johannes Blach)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms.programmer
Subject: 486SX
Message-ID: <1024862889@p111.f11.n310.z2.fidonet.org>
Date: 2 May 91 21:16:00 GMT
References: <1024391017@f90.n310.z2.fidonet.org>
Reply-To: Johannes_Blach%p111.f11.n310.z2@hippo.dfv.rwth-aachen.de (Johannes Blach)
Organization: NOT COPY PROTECTED <Vienna/Austria>
Lines: 14
Comment-To: Alexander_Holy@f1.n6000.z2.fidonet.org (Alexander Holy)


 > If Windows runs much to slow on a 286, and does not make sense to
 > run on a 386sx with less than 2 MB, why are we still using 16bit
 > compilers?

If windows runs slower in 386 mode than in Standard mode, why are wu still 
using Wimpdos?

Servus,

johi

---