Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!wuarchive!uunet!math.fu-berlin.de!uniol!unido!rwthinf!slcdec!hippo!f1.n6000.z2.fidonet.org!p111.f11.n310.z2.fidonet.org!Johannes_Blach
From: Johannes_Blach@p111.f11.n310.z2.fidonet.org (Johannes Blach)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms.programmer
Subject: 486SX
Message-ID: <1032559690@p111.f11.n310.z2.fidonet.org>
Date: 3 May 91 10:43:00 GMT
References: <1032427897@f90.n310.z2.fidonet.org>
Reply-To: Johannes_Blach%p111.f11.n310.z2@hippo.dfv.rwth-aachen.de (Johannes Blach)
Organization: NOT COPY PROTECTED <Vienna/Austria>
Lines: 19
Comment-To: Alexander_Holy@f1.n6000.z2.fidonet.org (Alexander Holy)


 > I you think twice, Windows makes no sense at all :-)

You only have to think to come to this conclusion. The second though would be 
redundant.

 > The most sensible solution would be to include DOS itself into the
 > Windows Kernel.

Please, don't even think about it. It took Mickeysoft about 10 Years to get 
worst bugs out of Dos. Imagine you have to start with this process again.


Servus,

johi

---