Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!visual!mjb From: mjb@visual.com (Mike Braca) Newsgroups: comp.windows.x Subject: Re: XDM?? Keywords: XDM, X Terminals Message-ID: <1991May9.013622.7174@visual.com> Date: 9 May 91 01:36:22 GMT References: <1991May3.203305.5000@cbnews.cb.att.com> Sender: mjb@Visual.COM Organization: Visual Technology Inc. Lines: 38 In article <1991May3.203305.5000@cbnews.cb.att.com> djb@cbnews.cb.att.com (david.j.bryant) writes: > 1) ... X terminals, do I need to have XDM available in order for them > to be maximally useful? It is a *major* convenience for getting to a login prompt on your terminal. Once you're up and running there's no advantage (at least not with any current implementations). > 2) Do commercial X terminal manufacturers encourage or require XDM? We encourage it very strongly. We don't require it; you can run local terminal emulators via a standard protocol like Telnet to get started. > 3) What X terminal and/or X Window System vendors (if any) > support XDM? All Visual X terminals support the R4 XDMCP protocol. In addition, we have a host selection menu that pops up after querying the network. All hosts that responded affirmatively to the query are listed, along with some status (requires a trivial hack to the XDM code), sort of like so: +----------------------------------------------------+ | HOST STATUS | +----------------------------------------------------+ | bird 8:09am up 2 days, 9 users, load 0.00 | | chief 8:08am up 5 days, 4 users, load 3.41 | | mchale 8:09am up 2:41, 7 users, load 2.01 | | ... | | | Just double-click on a host name to start a session to that host. I am now completely addicted to this method of host connection! Mike Braca Visual Technology mjb@visual.COM