Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!sdd.hp.com!think.com!yale!bunker!hcap!hnews!369!8!Mitch.Lynn
From: Mitch.Lynn@f8.n369.z1.fidonet.org (Mitch Lynn)
Newsgroups: misc.handicap
Subject: Re: artic vs vocalize
Message-ID: <19195@bunker.isc-br.com>
Date: 6 May 91 16:24:41 GMT
Sender: wtm@bunker.isc-br.com
Reply-To: Mitch.Lynn@f8.n369.z1.fidonet.org
Organization: FidoNet node 1:369/8 - The Catwalk BBS, Davie FL
Lines: 20
Approved: wtm@bunker.hcap.fidonet.org

Index Number: 15407

[This is from the Blink Talk Conference]

What do you mean that Vocal-Eyes is sluggish?  I am running
Vocal-Eyes on a 16 mhz 286, and have found the program to respond
with great celerity.  Perhaps WordPerfect is the culprit.  I am
not currently running that maladroit program; however, I have in
the past.  In fact, its slowness is one reason why I banished it
from my hard drive.

As for internal macros slowing down Vocal-Eyes, that is nonsense.
And comparing Provox to Vocal-Eyes is like comparing a skate
board to a Lamborghini.  Well, at least they both have wheels.

Mitch

--
Uucp: ..!{decvax,oliveb}!bunker!hcap!hnews!369!8!Mitch.Lynn
Internet: Mitch.Lynn@f8.n369.z1.fidonet.org