Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!apple!veritas!amdcad!amdcad!military From: d0mof@dtek.chalmers.se (Marcus Gustavsson) Newsgroups: sci.military Subject: Re: WWII city bombings Message-ID: <1991May7.062639.13112@amd.com> Date: 4 May 91 04:37:49 GMT References: <1991May1.030243.19860@amd.com> <1991May2.040234.20284@amd.com> Sender: military@amd.com Followup-To: soc.history Organization: Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden. Lines: 34 Approved: military@amd.com From: d0mof@dtek.chalmers.se (Marcus Gustavsson) [1. 28 lines quoting the entire previous article deleted. 2. Don't start paragraphs with From! 3. Followups to soc.history; this one slips through because there is some technical info not yet mentioned. --CDR ] [F]rom what I remember everyone bought the then science fiction ideas about air war. Every nation put their money into strategic bombers, because the airforce of the different nations used that type of bombing, as a mean to justify their own existence as a separate body of arms. I think that the airforces of the world could pull this off, because of the behaviour of the British people that got targeted by Zeppelines during WWI. I remember having read J.C Fuller (name?) and an Italian author (I could check his name), that wrote one or two books about the devastating effects of strategic bombing. The idea they had was mainly that, the future war i.e 1935+ would be won by the side that first could drop bombs on the enemy. They thought it would be enough with some 200 tons for to ensure victory. There was even a military doctrine that simply said "The bombers will always get through." When the allies started their, until mid-1944 tactical defeat, offensive, they quickly changed that into "Some bombers will make it back." Note that I don't think that some public pressure is the right word to use, on why the RAF started to invest in defence. Given the above doctrine, it is more likely that the only reason that the RAF invested in it, was because Churchill and some other politicians pushed quite much for it. -- USENET: d0mof@dtek.chalmers.se SNAIL: Marcus Gustafsson Harald Hjarnesgata 2 417 20 Gothenburg SWEDEN