Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!uunet!stanford.edu!rutgers!aramis.rutgers.edu!athos.rutgers.edu!christian
From: James.Quilty@comp.vuw.ac.nz (James William Quilty)
Newsgroups: soc.religion.christian
Subject: Re: DOES GOD HAVE A PENIS (SERIOUS - HONEST)
Message-ID: <May.6.23.43.05.1991.7830@athos.rutgers.edu>
Date: 7 May 91 03:43:06 GMT
Sender: hedrick@athos.rutgers.edu
Organization: Computer Science, Victoria University, Wellington, NewZealand
Lines: 15
Approved: christian@aramis.rutgers.edu

In article <May.3.03.04.19.1991.24152@athos.rutgers.edu>,
ATINTON@esoc.bitnet writes:
|> And the sole function of the penis is to propagate the species.

 This assumes the "reproductive definition of sex" (the only purpose
of sexuality/sexual intercourse is reproduction) which I personnally
don't subscribe to - it's not logical, but it is the position that is
pushed in this society for various reasons - read the good old "Hite
Report" by Shere Hite about the reproductive definition and it's
problems.

 Also, we are made in God's image, but we aren't identical to God - would God
look like me if God had a choice ???? :-)

Jim.