Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!udel!rochester!rutgers!modus!simm!yachaya!oliver!newsuser From: newsuser@oliver.SUBLINK.ORG (Ugo Cei) Newsgroups: comp.ai Subject: Re: Abduction: Summary Message-ID: <1008@oliver.SUBLINK.ORG> Date: 8 May 91 20:20:36 GMT References: <1991May6.173412.11283@cs.ubc.ca> Organization: Oliver, Pavia, Italy Lines: 39 kean@cs.ubc.ca (Alex Kean) writes: >The name > > \'\alpha \pi \alpha \gamma \omega \gamma \'\eta ==> (apagogy) >means what Peirce called "abduction" and > \epsilon \pi \alpha \gamma \omega \gamma \'\eta ==> (epagogy) >means "deduction". The \'\alpha ( a ) is like ( un- ) in English and >thus (apagogy) is the opposite of (epagogy). Not at all ! The alpha in ``apagwg\'h'' [substitute omega for `w' and eta for `h', using a full TeX-like notation is just too clumsy for me] is not a ``privative alpha'', that would indeed mean a negation of the concept. Where would the ``pi'' come from, in that case ? Rather, the word is formed from ``ap\'o'' (``from'' in current English, however the root is the same as of Sanskrit ``apa'', Latin ``ab'', English ``of'') and ``\'agw'' (English ``I lead'', Sanskrit ``ajati'', Latin ``ago''), thus meaning ``the act of leading away'', which in Latin is spelled ``abductio'', from ``abducere'', Greek ``ap-agage\~in''. On the other side, ``epagwg\'h'' is made from ``ep\'i'' and ``\'agw'', with the meanings of ``the act of leading into/onto''. Moreover, I think that in Aristotles, the word is used with the meaning of ``reasoning by induction'' and not ``deduction'', but I have no proofs to back this claim other than common sense and a reference in my Greek-Italian vocabulary. Whew! I never thought that the Greek I took while at ``Liceo Classico'' would have served me in an occasion like this. -- **************** | Ugo Cei | home: newsuser@oliver.sublink.org * OLIVER * | Via Colombo 7 | office: cei@ipvvis.unipv.it **************** | 27100 Pavia ITALY | "Real Programs Dump Core"