Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!uunet!zephyr.ens.tek.com!tektronix!percy!m2xenix!quagga!proxima!olsa99!mje99!mje
From: mje@mje99.UUCP (Mark J Elkins)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: T1000
Message-ID: <284@mje99.UUCP>
Date: 9 May 91 09:20:29 GMT
References: <1991May01.021126.1382@nstar.rn.com> <5@jassys.UUCP>
Reply-To: mje@mje99.UUCP (Mark J Elkins)
Organization: Mark's Machine (Working for Olivetti Africa)
Lines: 23

In article <5@jassys.UUCP> tony@jassys.UUCP (Tony Holden) writes:
>larry@nstar.rn.com (Larry Snyder) writes:
>
>> I don't know what you get with the T1000 doing uucp, but we are getting
>> around 1050 cps doing uucp for v.32
>
>
>1050cps!!  ACK!  I'm only getting ~870.  Come on, how are you getting
>rates that are that high?  Before v.32 I was getting 218cps on a 2400b
>modem.  By increasing the baud rate by 4 I get 872cps.

870cps (between 850 & 900) is what you get using v32 on a clean line with
nothing else (eg V42bis or MNP5). If you are transmitting compressed data
files then you are really passing through about twice this data rate.

If you switch on MNP5 and transmit uncompress data then you get to 
throughputs of about 1100cps in the real (noise) world.


-- 
  .  .     ___. .__      Olivetti Systems & Networks, Unix Support - Africa
 /| /|       / /__       UUCP: {uunet,olgb1,olnl1}!olsa99!mje (Mark Elkins)
/ |/ |ARK \_/ /__ LKINS  mje@olsa99.UUCP (Postmaster) Tel: +27 11 339 9093