Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!uunet!gordius!johnk
From: johnk@gordian.com (John Kalucki)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.sys.cisco
Subject: Re: RIP vs IGRP
Message-ID: <133@gordius.gordian.com>
Date: 9 May 91 16:57:03 GMT
References: <34858@boulder.Colorado.EDU>
Sender: news@gordian.com
Reply-To: johnk@gordian.com (John Kalucki)
Organization: Gordian; Costa Mesa, CA
Lines: 17

In article <34858@boulder.Colorado.EDU>, tli@cisco.com (Tony Li) writes:
|> 
|> [...]
|> The manual is wrong or at the very least incredibly unclear.  You can
|> redistribute subnet information into RIP.  The correct paragraph
|> should read something like:
|> [...]
|> 
|> Tony

Does cisco's implementation of rip allow for multiple subnet masks per network?
The rfc on rip (1058) doesn't mention this, but subseqent rfc's imply that
rip could handle multiple subnet masks.


		-John Kalucki
		jonhk@gordian.com