Path: utzoo!telecom-request
Date: Wed, 8 May 91 16:36:49 EDT
From: Carl Moore (VLD/VMB) <cmoore@brl.mil>
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Bellcore and the NNX Area Codes
Message-ID: <telecom11.343.13@eecs.nwu.edu>
Organization: TELECOM Digest
Sender: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 11, Issue 343, Message 13 of 13
Lines: 12

(No, NNX area codes have not come yet; 310,410,510, not yet in use at
this writing, still fit the N0X/N1X form.)

Could someone review the plan for NNX area codes?  Specifically, is
Mexico still to get the pseudo-area-codes of 52x where x is not
necessarily 0?  The first slew of NNX area codes is to be of form NN0,
with the past-or-current idea that some area codes will thus be able
to retain 1+7D (intra-NPA long distance) by not using PREFIXES of NN0
form.  Bellcore has or had something to say about the NN0/NNX format,
right?