Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!lll-winken!telecom-request
From: William.Degnan@f135.n82.z89.onebdos.UUCP (William Degnan)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Peculiar Intercept Recording
Message-ID: <telecom11.352.11@eecs.nwu.edu>
Date: 9 May 91 06:24:00 GMT
Sender: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
Reply-To: dleibold@attmail.com
Organization: TELECOM Digest
Lines: 24
Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 11, Issue 352, Message 11 of 12

[The following is a posting from (presumably) the Fidonet MDF 
echo conference... djcl]

 * Originally to All
 * Forwarded by Dave Leibold

I hit an interesting recording the other day.

"I'm sorry. (NXX-XXXX) ... is a working number. Please try your call
again later."

Interesting combination. Why would SWB be sorry the guy had a 
working number? And if it _is_ a working number ... well why 
doesn't it ... work?

Regards,

Bill

Origin: Private Line - Austin TX [Have Briefcase/Will Travel] (1:382/39)

William Degnan - via IMEx node 89:681/1
William.Degnan@f135.n82.z89.onebdos.UUCP