Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!mips!pacbell.com!att!princeton!njin!njitgw.njit.edu!hertz.njit.edu!jfa0522
From: jfa0522@hertz.njit.edu (john f andrews ece)
Newsgroups: comp.dsp
Subject: Re: 180 deg phase shift
Message-ID: <1991May10.153753.22596@njitgw.njit.edu>
Date: 10 May 91 15:37:53 GMT
References: <1991May9.160115.3494@cpsc.ucalgary.ca> <1991May09.192740.4165@bmerh2.bnr.ca>
Sender: news@njit.edu
Organization: New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, N.J.
Lines: 15
Nntp-Posting-Host: hertz.njit.edu

In article <1991May09.192740.4165@bmerh2.bnr.ca> myhui@bnr.ca (Michael Hui) writes:
>In article <1991May9.160115.3494@cpsc.ucalgary.ca> heredia@enel.ucalgary.ca (Edwin Heredia) writes:
>>For those who can't believe that inverting the signal produces 
>>a 180 deg. phase shift and for those who think that this trick 
>>works only with "easy-to-work" signals as pure tones:
>>
>>Given *ANY* signal  x(n)  with Fourier Transform  X(w)
>        ^^^
>
>Really? You surely mean _periodic_ signal.
>
>      Michael MY Hui      Ottawa Canada      myhui@bnr.ca

Why do we keep tagging onto this thread? "any signal ..with a fourier
ransform" implies any periodic signal....so why the beef? Let it go!