Xref: utzoo comp.graphics:17951 news.groups:31882 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!rex!uflorida!mailer.cc.fsu.edu!sun13!murray From: murray@sun13.scri.fsu.edu (John Murray) Newsgroups: comp.graphics,news.groups Subject: Re: More discussion on fate of comp.graphics? Message-ID: <2965@sun13.scri.fsu.edu> Date: 12 May 91 21:58:54 GMT References: <1991May9.140834.3564@jarvis.csri.toronto.edu> <1991May10.022230.22527@marlin.jcu.edu.au> <1991May10.042118.29533@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> <1991May11.073613.12539@marlin.jcu.edu.au> <4921@sahara.megatek.uucp> Followup-To: comp.graphics Organization: SCRI, Florida State University Lines: 15 Here's one idea that I don't think has been mentioned yet: Instead of creating one or a dozen new groups to solve the misuse of the existing group, what about making the existing group moderated? In my opinion, a new group that is unmoderated won't solve anything for very long, so if we need to go to a moderated group, the appropriate thing to do is to moderate the one we're already using, rather than create a new group and leave the old one to the wolves and wolf pups. -- *Standard Disclaimers Apply*| ---Get Out Of HELL Free!--- John R. Murray |The bearer of this card is entitled to forgive murray@vsjrm.scri.fsu.edu |Himself of all Sins, Errors and Transgressions. Supercomputer Research Inst.| -- D. Owen Rowley