Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!ucbvax!BBN.COM!malis From: malis@BBN.COM (Andy Malis) Newsgroups: comp.mail.multi-media Subject: Re: BBN/Slate users? Message-ID: <9105102123.AA11178@venera.isi.edu> Date: 10 May 91 21:12:14 GMT References: <9105101720.AA02887@Vicor.COM> Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Distribution: inet Organization: The Internet Lines: 51 > So, help me out, Slate users: What do you REALLY use Slate for? > And why do you use it instead of more "standard" (and sometimes > more usable) alternatives? On my project (packet switch software development) we chose to use Slate for our document preparation for a number of reasons: 1. We wanted to standardize on ONE set of document tools, to make document sharing easy and cut down on wasted time doing format switching and having to overcome more than one learning curve. 2. It's cheap and easy to obtain if you are in BBN (that was a consideration, but not a major one). 3. We all already had Suns (12 MB Sun 3/50s running SunOS 4.1.1). Although some of us on the project have Macs, not all of us do. 4. It does a good job on the sort of documents we are producing (functional and design specs, memos, test plans, etc.). 5. It's easy to learn and use, especially if you've ever used emacs and/or a Mac before. 6. It's very well integrated with email. We use email all the time. Between email, NFS, and soft links, it is VERY easy to share documents. (Not in real time; we don't need, or use, any of the conferencing stuff). Although it is easily extensible, we really haven't taken advantage of that at all. Most folks run it "bare". I'm one of the few people that seems do any personal customization at all. One thing we have done is a bit of integration with RCS, so that we can check documents in and out of RCS and when they print, the document name, RCS version, and checkin date is included in the header at the top of each page. This is actually done by "bbntools", a set of local enhancements to RCS, rather than by Slate itself. But the point is (as others have mentioned) that it is easy to do things your own way when you want to. We're split about 50/50 between Suntools and X users. It does perform better under Suntools, but I like everything else I get from X so much that I'm willing to put up with the (acceptable) performance, rather than the better performance under Suntools. Overall, I like it. I would be happier if it had more functionality, especially in the areas of page layout and the spreadsheets, but it does a good job and its editor is enough like emacs that I don't have to keep retraining my fingers (we use emacs for our code and straight text editing). Andy