Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ncar!hsdndev!cmcl2!lanl!beta.lanl.gov.!mikeg
From: mikeg@c3.c3.lanl.gov (M. P. Gerlek (hack grad student))
Newsgroups: comp.org.acm
Subject: Re: New format of CACM
Message-ID: <MIKEG.91May9184039@c3.c3.lanl.gov>
Date: 10 May 91 00:40:39 GMT
References: <5862@ns-mx.uiowa.edu> <1991May3.230122.13004@dsd.es.com>
	<91May4.114925edt.2077@ois.db.toronto.edu>
	<1991May9.165219.1558@tc.fluke.COM> <tg.673813399@isye.gatech.edu>
Sender: news@lanl.gov
Organization: Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico
Lines: 22
In-reply-to: tg@chmsr.gatech.edu's message of 9 May 91 18:23:19 GMT


In article <tg.673813399@isye.gatech.edu> tg@chmsr.gatech.edu (T.
Govindaraj) writes:
>
> Has someone thought about collecting these articles (both pro and con) and
> mailing to the editor of CACM? It might be worth it even after they change
> the format (unless it is really nice and readable).

I'm saving all the posts (pro and con) and also emailed opinions.  In
another week or so I'll edit it down and mail it off to ACM HQ.

A few others have said they've contacted ACM, but I figger more
commentary and opinion can't hurt.

-[mpg]
 mikeg@lanl.gov
 "Men in trees."
--

-[mpg]
 mikeg@lanl.gov
 "Men in trees."