Xref: utzoo gnu.misc.discuss:3039 comp.org.usenix:2057
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!ai-lab!life.ai.mit.edu!guest
From: guest@geech.ai.mit.edu (Guest Account)
Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss,comp.org.usenix
Subject: Re: How come include file patent isn't mentioned in position paper?
Message-ID: <GUEST.91May9010033@geech.ai.mit.edu>
Date: 9 May 91 05:00:33 GMT
References: <1991Apr29.174230.7605@agate.berkeley.edu>
	<NIX.91Apr29140634@valis.asd.sgi.com> <14730@ulysses.att.com>
Sender: news@ai.mit.edu
Distribution: usa
Organization: Guest at MIT
Lines: 11
In-reply-to: smb@ulysses.att.com's message of 8 May 91 20:49:27 GMT

In article <14730@ulysses.att.com> smb@ulysses.att.com (Steven Bellovin) writes:

   I confess -- I disagree with Stallman about the concept of software
   patents.  We've had our email discussions on the subject.  But I think
   we can all agree that abuses of the patent system are another matter
   entirely.

OK one more time.  This is your brain (o).  This is your brain on
patents (*).  Ssssssssss.   Just say no.

---BARBARA BUSH