Xref: utzoo gnu.misc.discuss:3072 comp.org.usenix:2068 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!emory!ox.com!hela!wotan.iti.org!scs From: scs@iti.org (Steve Simmons) Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss,comp.org.usenix Subject: Re: How come include file patent isn't mentioned in position paper? Message-ID: Date: 13 May 91 13:17:32 GMT References: <1991Apr29.174230.7605@agate.berkeley.edu> <14730@ulysses.att.com> <1991May10.072503.5575@Think.COM> Sender: usenet@iti.org (Hela News Manager) Distribution: usa Organization: Industrial Technology Institute Lines: 17 From: barmar@think.com (Barry Margolin) >This sounds much fancier than the standard #include file mechanism. Most >#include facilities don't have any way to specify portions of files, only >whole files. If memory server, the MTS file system has always provided the feature. It worked something like $CONTINUE WITH [line#][line#] Given the extreme variation mts files were allowed in line numbering, it could get quite pathological. -- "SPAM is a registered trademark of a pork product packed only by Geo. A Hormel & Co. Corp." -- Sun Technical Bulletin, March 1991, pg ii