Xref: utzoo comp.windows.ms:12499 comp.os.os2.misc:1315 comp.windows.ms.programmer:2359
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!sdd.hp.com!mips!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!ogicse!milton!sumax!polari!kentfo
From: kentfo@polari.UUCP (Kent Forschmiedt)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms,comp.os.os2.misc,comp.windows.ms.programmer
Subject: Re: OS/2 2.0 is here! vs Windows 3.0 vs NeXT/MACH
Message-ID: <4020@polari.UUCP>
Date: 9 May 91 18:36:41 GMT
References: <1991May7.164109.13128@amd.com> <-47gvh+@rpi.edu> <1991May08.011359.12322@comp.vuw.ac.nz>
Organization: Seattle Online Public Unix (206) 328-4944
Lines: 12

I have been half following this thread, and if this question has been
addressed, I missed it.

I am a Win3 developer, and I am interested in OS/2 as a more stable
platform upon which to do my work.  Windows' use of a single LDT renders
it very vulnerable to wild pointers, and the debugging kernel does not
generally recover from a crashed application.

Does OS/2 2.0 provide the support that the SDK kernel provides?
Can I run CodeView for Windows under OS/2?
-- 
Kent Forschmiedt ... kentfo@polari ... uw-beaver!sumax!polari!kentfo