Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!src.honeywell.com!msi.umn.edu!noc.MR.NET!gacvx2.gac.edu!vax1.mankato.msus.edu!tshea Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc Subject: Re: OS/2 with AT clone, Adaptec 1542B, and SCSI drive Message-ID: <1991May13.140346.560@vax1.mankato.msus.edu> From: tshea@vax1.mankato.msus.edu Date: 13 May 91 14:03:46 -0600 References: <2827F4F5.3E2E@tct.com> <1991May9.032806.26589@netcom.COM> Organization: Mankato State University Lines: 30 In article , m1phm02@fed.frb.gov (Patrick H. McAllister) writes: > In article <1991May9.032806.26589@netcom.COM> feustel@netcom.COM (David Feustel) writes: > > > OS/2 doesn't work with SCSI yet. Try again in a year. > > -- > David Feustel, 1930 Curdes Ave, Fort Wayne, IN 46805, (219) 482-9631 > EMAIL: netcom.com > > I am continually surprised whenever I see this statement: I have OS/2 1.3 > running on my Northgate clone with an Adaptec 1542B SCSI host adapter with > no problems. What doesn't work, I am told, is HPFS on a SCSI; I can't tell > you from my own experience, since I haven't yet tried it. > > Pat This saturday, myself, our other LAN Admin, and our 2 IBM SE's will be upgrading our 3 servers to OS/2 1.3. We are replacing the main drive in our domain controller (an ESDI drive) with a 300 meg SCSI drive and according to IBM, HPFS works fine and they are almost forcing us to put HPFS on that SCSI drive. I guess I will find out this weekend and will post our results. OS/2 1.3 works just fine on the IBM PS/2 90 and 95. tim LAN Admin International IS&DP 3M, Inc.