Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!uunet!mcsun!cernvax!chx400!bernina!stp
From: stp@bernina.ethz.ch (Stephan Paschedag)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os9
Subject: Re: more GNU software available...
Keywords: gnu, copyleft
Message-ID: <1991May9.075421.20988@bernina.ethz.ch>
Date: 9 May 91 07:54:21 GMT
References: <1991Apr27.085521.2074@bernina.ethz.ch> <34@kilroy.UUCP> <19131@sdcc6.ucsd.edu>
Reply-To: stp@bernina.UUCP (Stephan Paschedag)
Organization: Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Zuerich
Lines: 14

In article <19131@sdcc6.ucsd.edu> jclark@sdcc6.ucsd.edu (John Clark) writes:
>I believe it goes like this, if you pass a binary of a GNU tool on
>to someone else you must make 'arrangements' for the original source
>to be available to that persone(entity). If you compile a 'new' ....

Anyway, if there is someone out there who would like to have the sources, 
please tell me so and I will upload them.
Some weeks ago I've asked who would prefer only to get the executable.
The result of this question was, that about 90% of all answers were that 
the sources were useless, or that people were too lazy to recompile all the
stuff, or didn't have a machine big enough to compile them (gcc,g++..).

best regards
Stephan