Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!apple!limbo!taylor From: kling@ics.uci.edu (Rob Kling) Newsgroups: comp.society Subject: Re: Changing moderators/unmoderating "comp.society" Message-ID: <2008@limbo.Intuitive.Com> Date: 13 May 91 07:13:28 GMT Sender: taylor@limbo.Intuitive.Com Lines: 35 Approved: taylor@Limbo.Intuitive.Com Thom, I would hope that comp.society becomes much more active than it is now. Right now, many comp.society issues are discussed much more frequently on the moderated RISKS board and the unmoderated comp.org.eff.talk. Rapid reposne time is important in my view .... if the board gets 20 messages a day instead of 20 messages a month, the moderator will be superbusy in processing the messages. I would not be surprised if Peter Neuman spends 50% time moderating RISKS since I get several full (15K-25K) each week, most weeks, with few lapses. Peter has played a major role in pormoting RISKS, and now has columns based on RISKS in the ACM's SIGSOFT Newsletter and Communications of the ACM. Perhaps tis is an exceptional case, but one which is pertienet because RISKS posts many messages and discussions which should appear here too (and are not cross posted). I also read unmoderated boards and sometimes they develop flame wars for a few days now & then. Other than these occassional brushfires, I see no real problems w/the unmoderated boards, especially when the traffic volume is relatively high. I realize that alot of the higher volume can be more noise than signal ... but again, that depends ... I would like to see a moderator who can develop comp.society into a livlier forum. Absent that, I don't see a fundamental problem with an unmoderated board. Moderating is alot of work, and Dave has done a good job. I imagine that the routine can become a bit much after a while since the moderator should be checking his/her mail for messages to edit/forward several times each 24 hour period..... (IMHO). Maybe the moderator becomes a slave to the board (grin) w/o vacation, sick-leave, etc.. /R