Xref: utzoo comp.databases:10019 comp.sources.wanted:16617 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!dali.cs.montana.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!sdd.hp.com!mips!apple!portal!cup.portal.com!FelineGrace From: FelineGrace@cup.portal.com (Dana B Bourgeois) Newsgroups: comp.databases,comp.sources.wanted Subject: Re: WANTED: Copy of Clipper'87 (4.0) Message-ID: <42184@cup.portal.com> Date: 10 May 91 07:28:23 GMT References: <1991May8.200658.28027@cs.wayne.edu> Organization: The Portal System (TM) Lines: 19 First off I have to echo Tom. It isn't legit to upgrade software then sell the old disk set and manuals. But, telling someone that they can't have an older set of code is not great stuff either. There are some legitimate reasons to want another copy of 'old' software. Even tho the programmers would rather not support it and books aren't available, etc. if one wants it and it does the job then one should be able to get it. So here's what I do. I buy a copy of the latest version and then beg, borrow, the version I want. A downgrade so to speak. If this is for some reason not legit then I will be very surprised since a purchaser of version 1.0 may upgrade indefinitely and use any version he so chooses, not just the latest one. And if some legal eagle makes convincing sounds about the legality of 'downgrading' then I think I'd just do it anyway. Latest versions always cost more than prior so who is being hurt financially? Dana Bourgeois @ cup.portal.com "part-time anarchist"