Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!uupsi!sugar!peter From: peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva) Subject: Re: NeXT Press Release Message-ID: <1991May9.172353.2545@sugar.hackercorp.com> Organization: Sugar Land Unix -- Houston, TX References: <1991May8.173528.361@sugar.hackercorp.com> Date: Thu, 9 May 1991 17:23:53 GMT In article melling@cs.psu.edu (Michael D Mellinger) writes: > In article <1991May8.173528.361@sugar.hackercorp.com> peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva) writes: > You said something about using preprocessors languages, The language design is a front-end to C along with a runtime library. How it's implemented can't change that. Neither language is what one would call a good fundamental OO language. They're both about as good as can be given the constraints, but it's certainly not worth arguing the merits of one over the other. -- Peter da Silva. `-_-' .