Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ncar!gatech!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!ncoast!allbery From: allbery@NCoast.ORG (Brandon S. Allbery KB8JRR/AA) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy Subject: Re: An interesting idea... Message-ID: <1991May10.011138.8753@NCoast.ORG> Date: 10 May 91 01:11:38 GMT References: <11879@uwm.edu> <7r8G&?-&1@cs.psu.edu> Reply-To: allbery@ncoast.ORG (Brandon S. Allbery KB8JRR/AA) Followup-To: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy Organization: North Coast Public Access Un*x (ncoast) Lines: 23 As quoted from <7r8G&?-&1@cs.psu.edu> by melling@cs.psu.edu (Michael D Mellinger): +--------------- | In article <11879@uwm.edu> gblock@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Gregory R Block) writes: | Not even the Amiga can claim to beat both of the above in market | penetration, and you claim that yours is better than thiers, when it's | not even better than the Amiga's???? | | Whatever. +--------------- Let me get this straight, Mike: your pet SlAB or CuBE or BoULDER or whatever isn't doing very well breaking into IBM or Apple markets, yet you claim it's already the victor? Aside from the obvious fact that if machine capabilities were the primary deciding factor IBM would be defunct, there seems to be something wrong with this reasoning. Maybe you need to learn how the REAL business world works. ++Brandon -- Me: Brandon S. Allbery Ham: KB8JRR/AA 10m,6m,2m,220,440,1.2 Internet: allbery@NCoast.ORG (restricted HF at present) Delphi: ALLBERY AMPR: kb8jrr.AmPR.ORG [44.70.4.88] uunet!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!ncoast!allbery KB8JRR @ WA8BXN.OH