Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!samsung!munnari.oz.au!manuel!ccadfa!prolix!dac
From: dac@prolix.pub.uu.oz.au (Andrew Clayton)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
Subject: Re: 8-bit death
Message-ID: <19202edb.ARN1e67@prolix.pub.uu.oz.au>
Date: 11 May 91 12:19:07 GMT
References: <1075@stewart.UUCP> <3330.tnews@templar.actrix.gen.nz> <1991May8.124648.17903@en.ecn.purdue.edu>
 <1991May9.174637.3153@sugar.hackercorp.com>
Reply-To: dac@prolix.pub.uu.oz.au
Followup-To: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
Organization: More like Mis~, really.
Lines: 12

In article <1991May9.174637.3153@sugar.hackercorp.com>, Peter da Silva writes:

> here). ACLs are nice, but the lack of ACLs in UNIX is hardly a reason to
> justify the complete lack of protection in OS/2.
> 
> PS: comp.os.os2.advocacy. It's time.
                            ~~~~~~~~~
You're a sick man, Peter.

:-)
Dac
--