Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!menudo.uh.edu!lobster!sugar!peter From: peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva) Subject: Re: Real Time UNIX (Re: NeXT software size) Message-ID: <1991May13.004526.717@sugar.hackercorp.com> Organization: Sugar Land Unix -- Houston, TX References: <1991May6.112709.8280@sugar.hackercorp.com> <361@ncmicro.lonestar.org> <947@cns.SanDiego.NCR.COM> Date: Mon, 13 May 1991 00:45:26 GMT In article <947@cns.SanDiego.NCR.COM> dltaylor@cns.SanDiego.NCR.COM (Dan Taylor) writes: > Given the grief that many of us suffered under 1.0 and 1.1, I wonder if > we wouldn't have been better off with C= buying OS-9/68K, which was > reasonably stable, at the time, then adding the part of AmigaDOS that > really shines, Intuition, and the support for the graphics chips, as > Microware has added graphics support to OS-9, finally. Please, no > flames, it's just an idle thought. I asked about that, at the time. The response I got indicated that nobody at Amiga had ever heard of Microware. Weird. -- Peter da Silva. `-_-' .