Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!cs.utexas.edu!rice!uupsi!sugar!peter From: peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy Subject: Re: 8-bit death Message-ID: <1991May13.170427.10162@sugar.hackercorp.com> Date: 13 May 91 17:04:27 GMT References: <1991May10.183627.29486@neon.Stanford.EDU> <3626.tnews@templar.actrix.gen.nz> <1991May12.181436.20304@NCoast.ORG> Organization: Sugar Land Unix -- Houston, TX Lines: 9 In article <1991May12.181436.20304@NCoast.ORG> allbery@ncoast.ORG (Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH) writes: > If you're going to multitask, one task shouldn't have the capability of > crashing the whole system. That's the sort of thing 8088 unixes pull (because > Intel left them no choice). I expect better of 680x0's.... 68000 doesn't have an MMU, Brandon. -- Peter da Silva. `-_-' .