Xref: utzoo comp.sys.amiga.applications:940 comp.sys.amiga.misc:3471 comp.sys.amiga.advocacy:2894
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!sdd.hp.com!mips!pacbell.com!att!ucbvax!nj
From: nj@magnolia.Berkeley.EDU (Narciso Jaramillo)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.applications,comp.sys.amiga.misc,comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
Subject: Re: WB 2.03
Message-ID: <NJ.91May10091212@magnolia.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: 10 May 91 16:12:12 GMT
References: <19079@sdcc6.ucsd.edu> <21346@cbmvax.commodore.com>
	<1991May8.025400.26915@cbnewsj.att.com>
	<1991May8.035400.467@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu>
Sender: nobody@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Distribution: usa
Organization: Postcarcinogenic Bliss, Inc.
Lines: 22
In-reply-to: es1@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu's message of 8 May 91 03:54:00 GMT

vrr@cbnewsj.att.com (veenu.r.rashid) writes:

> >2.  My dealer is working with Workbench 36.10 and
> >
> >	REFUSES
> >
> >    to contact Commodore to get these upgrades.

es1@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Ethan Solomita) writes:

> This doesn't sound like something you can blame Commodore
> about.

On the other hand, he should certainly be able to complain to
Commodore about it.  After all, dealers are authorized by Commodore;
if a dealer isn't behaving properly, Commodore should be able to
threaten said dealer with termination of authorization, no?  But
in any case, they should look into it; such problems reflect poorly
on the company.


nj