Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!olivea!samsung!spool.mu.edu!mips!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!usc!orion.oac.uci.edu!balboa.eng.uci.edu!nguyent
From: nguyent@balboa.eng.uci.edu (Thien Nguyen)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
Subject: Re: A3000 troubles, OS 2.0 troubles, and then some.
Message-ID: <282B0DC3.28432@orion.oac.uci.edu>
Date: 10 May 91 21:16:51 GMT
References: <190a9b10.ARN006a@nesbbx.UUCP> <1991May08.220526.28831@ariel.unm.edu> <21459@cbmvax.commodore.com>
Organization: University of California, Irvine
Lines: 18
Nntp-Posting-Host: balboa.eng.uci.edu

In article <21459@cbmvax.commodore.com> martin@cbmvax.commodore.com (Martin Hunt) writes:
>
>In a previous post, you said that the 3000 wasn't any faster unless you
>ran 2.0.  This is not true.  Both should be 10 times faster than a 2000
>(except for floating point, which can be much faster than that).
>Do you have the data and instruction caches enabled under 1.3?
                                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


How do I know if my A3000 has caches enabled or disabled?



>Martin Hunt         Commodore-Amiga          martin@cbmvax.commodore.com  
>
>"Windows 3.0 is hot because it's really fun.  It has brought some
>excitement back into the PC industry" - Microsoft
>I wonder who took the excitement out in the first place?