Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!jarthur!petunia!csuchico.edu!ekrimen
From: ekrimen@ecst.csuchico.edu (Ed Krimen)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: Mega STe Questions.
Message-ID: <1991May14.033337.1842@ecst.csuchico.edu>
Date: 14 May 91 03:33:37 GMT
References: <5149@cernvax.cern.ch> <1991May9.053703.1056@intacc.uucp>
Sender: news@ecst.csuchico.edu (USENET)
Organization: California State University, Chico
Lines: 18

In article <1991May9.053703.1056@intacc.uucp> zerobeat@intacc.uucp (Ferenc Szabo) writes:
>There is another thread which asks the question: Is a high res mouse better than
>the stock Atari mouse?  Well I gotta tell you that the difference is night and 
>day.  My Golden Image GI-250 mouse takes all the sluggishness out of GEM.  
>Clicking is way easier and accurate.  Obviously I don't mean that GEM itself is
>improved; it's just that it SEEMS THAT WAY.  I always admired the smooth MAC 
>desktop-mousing around compared to the Atari.  Now it's BETTER than a MAC--the
>feel that is.  Spend hundreds and hundreds on a computer--why not treat yourselfto an excellent $75 (Canadian $) mouse?

May I ask if you've tried the mouse that came with the MegaSTe?  I think it
may be different than the mouse you had with your 1040.


-- 
   |||   Ed Krimen [ekrimen@ecst.csuchico.edu or al661@cleveland.freenet.edu]
   |||   Video Production Major, California State University, Chico
  / | \  SysOp, Fuji BBS: 916-894-1261
         TWO WEEKS UNTIL GRADUATION!!