Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!ohstpy!miavx1!jfeldhouse
From: jfeldhouse@miavx1.acs.muohio.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.games
Subject: Re: Strategic Conquest 3.0 BUGS!!!!!!
Message-ID: <5251.282c9134@miavx1.acs.muohio.edu>
Date: 12 May 91 05:49:56 GMT
References: <21217@frame.UUCP>
Lines: 32

In article <21217@frame.UUCP>, jmp@jaco.Frame.COM (Jeff Papineau) writes:
> If you have played this game in two player/two machine net mode, you know
> there is a serious tactical bug, where much of the time, as the game gets
> complex, the newly created pieces will only move one square on the first time
> they are moved from there originating city. This bug did not exist in previous
> versions of the game. I have gone back to 2.55 for serious two player games.
> 
> Jeff Papineau

I have also noticed this bug, it is quite annoying.
I am not sure this works all the time but it seems
that if when a new pice is created you click on the city
when it is time for said piece to move then it uses
up one move and you are able to finish your move normally.

I think that if you restart the game it goes away for awhile also.

I wrote to Delta Tao about another bug,
it seems that when you choose Load Transport(?),
in order to load all adjacent armies onto a transport
the game forgets about the transport.  Thus either
load them manually or after load transport, Wake the transport
and the game will normally remember said transport.
(Strange during this forgotten stage, the transport
is not actually asleep as one might think.)

If there is anyone around the Cincinnati area that
likes Strategic Conquest or Spaceward Ho, how about
writing me and perhaps we could play a game some time.
(Cincinnati Ohio)

Jim Feldhouse