Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!news.nd.edu!news.cs.indiana.edu!noose.ecn.purdue.edu!gn.ecn.purdue.edu!jess
From: jess@gn.ecn.purdue.edu (Jess M Holle)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.misc
Subject: Re: TrueType questions answered
Message-ID: <1991May13.180624.3819@gn.ecn.purdue.edu>
Date: 13 May 91 18:06:24 GMT
Article-I.D.: gn.1991May13.180624.3819
References: <673545631.0@blkcat.FidoNet.Org> <150@eclectic.COM> <1991May11.214221.8871@neon.Stanford.EDU>
Organization: Purdue University Engineering Computer Network
Lines: 10

In article <1991May11.214221.8871@neon.Stanford.EDU> torrie@cs.stanford.edu (Evan Torrie) writes:
...lots of stuff regarding the speed of ATM 2.0 vs. speed of TrueType

Out of curiousity, what have screen and printer tests of ATM 2.0 and TrueType
revealed on an 030 machine when the 030/881 optimized version of ATM is used?

I am very interested, especially since no one seems to have made this
distinction so far.

Jess Holle