Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!unixhub!stanford.edu!neon.Stanford.EDU!torrie
From: torrie@cs.stanford.edu (Evan Torrie)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.misc
Subject: Re: TrueType questions answered
Message-ID: <1991May13.194633.24950@neon.Stanford.EDU>
Date: 13 May 91 19:46:33 GMT
References: <673545631.0@blkcat.FidoNet.Org> <150@eclectic.COM> <1991May11.214221.8871@neon.Stanford.EDU> <1991May13.180624.3819@gn.ecn.purdue.edu>
Sender: torrie@neon.Stanford.EDU (Evan James Torrie)
Organization: Computer Science Department, Stanford University, Ca , USA
Lines: 16

jess@gn.ecn.purdue.edu (Jess M Holle) writes:

>In article <1991May11.214221.8871@neon.Stanford.EDU> torrie@cs.stanford.edu (Evan Torrie) writes:
>...lots of stuff regarding the speed of ATM 2.0 vs. speed of TrueType

>Out of curiousity, what have screen and printer tests of ATM 2.0 and TrueType
>revealed on an 030 machine when the 030/881 optimized version of ATM is used?

  I use the 020/881 version of ATM, and TrueType is still faster for what
I want to do.

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Evan Torrie.  Stanford University, Class of 199?       torrie@cs.stanford.edu   
"If it weren't for your gumboots, where would you be?   You'd be in the
hospital, or in-firm-ary..."  F. Dagg