Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!unix.cis.pitt.edu!pitt!darth!investor.pgh.pa.us!rbp
From: rbp@investor.pgh.pa.us (Bob Peirce #305)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next
Subject: Is ls -L broken in 2.0?
Message-ID: <1991May13.013701.21135@investor.pgh.pa.us>
Date: 13 May 91 01:37:01 GMT
Reply-To: rbp@investor.pgh.pa.us (Bob Peirce #305)
Organization: Cookson, Peirce & Co., Pittsburgh, PA
Lines: 5

Neither ls -L nor ls -lL are producing output to show symbolic links.
Are they broken or is there another command I should be using?
-- 
Bob Peirce, Pittsburgh, PA        rbp@investor.pgh.pa.us         412-471-5320
venetia@investor.pgh.pa.us [NeXT Mail]     ...!uunet!pitt!investor!rbp [UUCP]