Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!dali.cs.montana.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!sdd.hp.com!mips!news.cs.indiana.edu!nstn.ns.ca!bonnie.concordia.ca!cidsv01.cid.aes.doe.CA!cidsv01.cid.aes.doe.CA!aspgpas
From: aspgpas@cidsv01.cid.aes.doe.CA (Peter Silva)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.sgi
Subject: Re: user ID
Message-ID: <1991May10.143934.11122@cid.aes.doe.CA>
Date: 10 May 91 14:39:34 GMT
References: <1991May8.202912.25142@bnlux1.bnl.gov>
Sender: @cid.aes.doe.CA
Reply-To: psilva@cid.aes.doe.ca
Distribution: na
Organization: Environment Canada
Lines: 36


In article <1991May8.202912.25142@bnlux1.bnl.gov>, bstewart@bnlux1.bnl.gov
(Bruce Stewart) writes:
|> 
|>   The System Administrator's Guide states that a user ID number must
|> be between 0 and 60,000; is this for real? Most systems  have a
|> maximum of 2^16-1 = 65535 which is understandable. If 60,000
|> is for real it will cause some serious grief to our computing
|> services division which is trying to establish uniform user
|> IDs for all our systems.

Wait! There's more!

	EP/IX  (like MIPS/OS, but value added by CDC) says
all uids are < 50000.

And EP/IX, IRIX, and SunOS all disagree on who nobody is
   
uid and gid = 14, 30001, and 65534 respectively (this doesn't
matter unless you use NFS, which you probably do! )  On 
SunOS, 65534 used to be -2, but POSIX says uids are unsigned, so SUNOS
changed the interpretation of the same bit pattern.
We have a mix of SunOS 4.0.x and 4.1.x (not to mention
PC-NFS) running, and we are constantly bombarded by messages
from the accounting system complaining about this.

I prefer 14 myself, but try convincing other OS's about this
wisdom...

Any other pearls of inter-operability out there ?


--
Peter Silva			OS Support 
psilva@cid.aes.doe.ca		Dorval Computing Centre
(514) 421-4692			Atmospheric Environment Service