Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!unix.cis.pitt.edu!dsinc!netnews.upenn.edu!vax1.cc.lehigh.edu!cert.sei.cmu.edu!krvw
From: esaholm@utu.fi (Esa Holmberg)
Newsgroups: comp.virus
Subject: Re: TSR Virus Detector (PC)
Message-ID: <0006.9105101443.AA06343@ubu.cert.sei.cmu.edu>
Date: 9 May 91 16:16:34 GMT
Sender: Virus Discussion List <VIRUS-L@LEHIIBM1>
Lines: 14
Approved: krvw@sei.cmu.edu

RADAI@HUJIVMS.BITNET (Y. Radai) writes:

>  The programs which I compared were F-LOCK, FSP, SECURE, TSAFE, and

	I'm afraid you have tested a wrong program; F-DRIVER
	would be the actual resident virus tester of the F-PROT
	package, and not F-LOCK. I wonder, what the results
	would look like with F-DRIVER instead of F-LOCK ?

- --
   __________________________________________________
   ) Esa Holmberg -- esaholm@utu.fi, ekho@ttl.fi,    )
  /                  ekho@f152.n222.z2.fidonet.org  /
 / fax : +358 21 510 017, Elisa : Holmberg Esa TTL /